| Abstract|| |
Background: The aim of the study is to review the experience with the classic Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy through the RUQ approach and the circumlinear supraumbilical fold approach (circumumbilical [CU]) pyloromyotomy (an approach that combines the ease and safety of the open pyloromyotomy with the advantages of minimal invasiveness).
Patients and Methods: A single centre review in a period of 12 years from January 2001 to December 2013 with the institutional ethical committee's approval, evaluating 316 pyloromyotomies based on surgical approach: RUQ (171); and CU (145). Patients' demographics, acid-base/electrolyte status on presentation, mean operative time (MOT), postoperative length of stay (LOS) at hospital, and complications were recorded.
Results: Patients demographics, acid − base/electrolyte status on presentation; and MOT were not significantly different. The median LOS was 33 and 30 minutes for CU and RUQ, respectively, with no statistical significant difference between the two groups. One patient in the CU group had a late adhesive bowel obstruction requiring laparotomy and bowel resection. Moreover, wound infection rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (CU 3; and RUQ; 3; P = 0.15).
Conclusions: Pyloromyotomy is associated with a low complication rate. Cosmetically, CU is superior to the RUQ approach. Its short learning curve and the feasibility to examine the integrity of the duodenal mucosa intraoperatively may make CU a safer alternative in case of surgeons who are still practicing the RUQ approach in countries with a challenged resource settings.
Keywords: Pyloric stenosis, Pyloromyotomy, Umbilical incision, Laparoscopy, Minimal invasive pyloromyotomy
|How to cite this article:|
Zakaria OM. Non-laparoscopic minimal surgical approach to pyloromyotomy: An experience from a challenged resource setting. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2016;13:189-92
|How to cite this URL:|
Zakaria OM. Non-laparoscopic minimal surgical approach to pyloromyotomy: An experience from a challenged resource setting. Afr J Paediatr Surg [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 28];13:189-92. Available from: http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/text.asp?2016/13/4/189/194672
| Introduction|| |
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is one of the more common paediatric surgical problems with an incidence of 2−4 in 1000 infants. IHPS is a condition in young infants marked by thickening of the pylorus muscle leading to gastric outlet obstruction. Oral administration of erythromycin in the first few weeks of life has been shown to increase the risk of developing IHPS.
The traditional non-surgical treatment with the use of atropine for IHPS was suggested by some authors as an effective therapy that may be an alternative to pyloromyotomy if the length of the hospital stay and the necessity of continuing oral atropine medication are accepted. However, the cost-effectiveness of this manoeuvre may be high for resource-challenged and/or low-resource settings.
Surgical management of IHPS has traditionally involved a Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy using a classical RUQ incision. Although, effective at providing excellent exposure of the pylorus, this method results in an abdominal scar that grows with the patient, often becoming quite significant with time. In the interest of improved cosmesis, alternative procedures have evolved, which include both laparoscopic as well as umbilical approaches.,,,,
Nevertheless, few studies have investigated the cosmetic outcome of the current approaches to pyloromyotomy in infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. We describe hereby our results of pyloromyotomy using two different techniques of RUQ and circumumbilical (CU).
| Patients and Methods|| |
All patients who underwent pyloromyotomy for IHPS during the period from January 2001 to December 2013 were included in the study. With the approval of the institutional ethical committee; the recorded data included the patient's age, sex, acid − base status and chloride levels. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on the surgical approach: RUQ approach and circumlinear supraumbilical fold approach (circumumbilical [CU]), [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. In each group we looked at two variables: The mean operative time (MOT), the median postoperative length of stay (LOS), as well as the rate of complications. Complication rates were subdivided into major and minor complications. Where appropriate, data were presented as mean, standard deviation and 95% Confidence Interval as well as in the form of graphs (SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.). Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for categorical data. To assess the statistical significance of these variables, with P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Patients who had complications were excluded from the MOT and LOS analyseis.
| Results|| |
Collected data of the studied 316 patients [Graph 1] who underwent pyloromyotomy were recorded [Table 1] and [Table 2]. They were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach used: RUQ, 171 patients [Table 1] and CU, 145 patients [Table 2]. As shown in [Table 1] and [Table 2] the demographic and preoperative laboratory data for the two groups were not significantly different [Figure 1]. The MOT for RUQ was 36 min and 40 min for the CU. This difference of 4 minutes in the MOT is not clinically significant; therefore, statistical analysis was not applied to it.
|Table 1: Description of Data of patients who underwent right upper quadrant pyloromyotomy (GROUP 1)|
Click here to view
|Table 2: Description of Data of patients who underwent supraumbilical fold approach pyloromyotomy (GROUP 2)|
Click here to view
A shorter LOS for the RUQ group was noted, but this was not statistically different from the CU group.
Major complications were noted in two cases of intestinal perforation occurred using the RUQ approach. One perforation was mucosal (within the pyloromyotomy incision and one was in the duodenum distal to the pyloromyotomy incision caused by a Babcock clamp used to hold the duodenum distal to the pyloric olive. There was one gastric perforation using the CU approach which was also caused by a Babcock clamp used to pull the olive out [Table 3].
All intestinal perforations in the RUQ and the CU groups were recognised intra operatively; the patients recovered well postoperatively with simply suturing the perforation and with holding the oral feeding for 24−48 hours. Patients were discharged home between 48 and 72 h later.
In the category of minor complications, the data revealed three instances of wound infection in the CU approach and three in the RUQ approach, again these figures are not statistically significant, P = 0.519 as shown in [Table 3].
The mean number of episodes of postoperative emesis with the RUQ and CU groups was 1.8 and 2, respectively, numbers that are clinically similar.
| Discussion|| |
Despite many theories, the aetiology of IHPS remains largely unknown. Although, occasional publications suggest non-operative  endoscopic  or other non-traditional  managements as alternatives, longitudinal extramucosal myotomy is nearly universally accepted for the correction of this condition. Pyloromyotomy is a common surgical procedure, performed today both by pediatric surgeons and general surgeons., Different approaches have been advocated over the years, from Robertson gridiron incision, to the RUQ approach  with more empathises recently on improving cosmetic results.
CU approach for pyloromyotomy was described to a certain a better cosmetic outcome. Because of its low complication rate, this approach was accepted by many surgeons from various schools.,,,,,,, However, in comparison with the RUQ approach, some studies observed that the CU approach led to an increase in the rate of wound infection and longer operative time. This concept is contradicted with our data that showed no significant statistical difference among CU and RUQ groups regarding the MOT and the wound infection. The increased infectious risk has been shown to be definitively reduced by the use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
Among the complications of pyloromyotomy (regardless of the approach), the most life-threatening is mucosal perforation, particularly if not recognized., In our series mucosal perforation was seen in a total of four patients out of 316 patients (1.3%). However, some reported the incidence of perforation to be as high as 19% in the recent publications of open series. Mucosal injury usually occurs when an incision is carried to deep or too far distally or when an instrument presses down on this delicate membrane. The intracavitary CU pyloromyotomy is an appealing alternative to the conventional open technique in which the olive, along with a small portion of the antrum and the duodenum, is exteriorised. Because the pylorus is below the incision, and the laparotomy can be shorter, trauma is minimised. This type of myotomy has been used with a RUQ incision, as well as a CU incision.,
| Conclusions|| |
Circumlinear supraumbilical fold approach to pyloromyotomy is a valuable operation that may produce an undetectable scar. This technique is safe, simple, and easily reproducible and not requiring special equipment or instrumentation providing an excellent exposure and operative space to the pylorus with no difference from the RUQ approach. Therefore, while awaiting final answers from further randomized controlled trials with regard to safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and long-term cosmesis of the laparoscopic approach, we feel that second thoughts are still needed before entering the laparoscopic era for pyloromyotomy especially in countries with a challenged resource settings like ours.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Hernanz-Schulman M. infantile hypertophic pyloric stenosis. Radiology 2003; 227(2): 319-31.
Ebery MD, Eide MB, Nylund CM. Association of azithromycin in early infancy with development of pyloric stenosis [abstract G-993]. Presented at: 54th
Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC); Washington, DC; 2014; September 7.
Kawahara H, Takama Y, Yoshida H, Nakai H, Okuyama H, Kubota A, Yoshimura N, Ida S, Okada A. Medical treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Should we always slice the “olive”? J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40(12):1848-51.
Lazar D, Naik B, Fitch ME, Nuchtern JG, Brandt ML. Transumbilical pyloromyotomy with umbilicoplasty provides ease of access and excellent cosmetic results. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 1408-10.
Alain JL, Grousseau D, Longis B, Ugazzi M, Terrier G. Extramucosal pyloromyotomy by laparoscopy. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1995; 6: 10-12.
Downey Jr EC. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery 1998; 7: 220-4.
Najmaldin A, Tan HL. Early experience with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30: 37-8.
Rothenberg SS. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: The slice and pull technique. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Techn 1997; 1: 39-41.
Tan KC, Bianchi A. Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 399.
Aspelund G, Langer JC. Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2007; 16: 27-33.
Ibarguen-Secchia E. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for congenital pyloric stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 598-600.
Ordorica-Flores R 1
, León-Villanueva V, Bracho-Blanchet E, Reyes-Retana R, Dávila-Perez R, Varela-Fascinetto G, Tovilla-Mercado JM, Lezama-DelValle P, Nieto-Zermeño J. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: A comparative study of pyloric traumamyotomy and Fredet-Ramstedt pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36: 1000-3.
Maxwell-Armstrong CA. Surgical management of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. can it be performed by general surgeons? Ann R Coil Surg Engl 2000; 82: 341-3.
Pranikoff T, Campbell B, Travis J. Differences in outcome with subspecialty care: Pyloromyotomy in North Carolina. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 352-6.
Robertson DE. Congenital pyloric stenosis. Ann Surg 1940; 112: 687-94.
O'Neill JA, Fonkalsrud EW, editors. Pediatrie surgery 6th
ed. Philadelphia Pa: Mosby; 2006. p. 1218-1219.
Takamizawa S, Obatake M, Muraji T, Tsugawa C, Nishijima E, Satoh S. Supraumbilical pyloromyotomy: Comparison between intracorporeal and extracorporeal approaches. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20: 101-4.
Karri V, Bouhadiba N, Mathur A. Pyloromyotomy through circumbilical incision with fascial extension. Pediatr Surg Int 2003; 19: 695-6.
Blümer RM, Hessel NS, van Baren R, Kuyper CF, Aronson DC. Comparison between umbilical and transverse right upper abdominal incision for pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 1091-3.
Fitzgerald PG, Lau GY, Cameron GS. Umbilical fold incision for pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25: 1117-8.
Leinwand MJ, Shaul DB, Anderson KD. The umbilical fold approach to pyloromyotomy: Is it a safe alternative to the right upper-quadrant approach? J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 362-7.
Ladd AP, Nemeth SA, Kirincich AN, Scherer LR 3rd
, Engum SA, Rescorla FJ, West KW, Rouse TM, Billmire DF, Grosfeld JL. Supmumbilical pyloromyotomy: A unique indication for antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: 974-7.
Taqi E, Boutros J, Emil S, Dubé S, Puligandla P, Flageole H, Laberge JM. Evaluation of surgical approaches to pyloromyotomy: A single center experience. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 865-8.
van den Ende ED, Allema JH, Hazebroek FW, Breslau PJ. Can pyloromyotomy in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis be performed in any hospital? Resuls from two teaching hospitals. Eur J Pediatr 2007; 166: 553-7.
White JS, Clements WD, Heggarty P, Sidhu S, Mackle E, Stirling I. Treatment of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a district general hospital: A review of 160 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38: 1333-6.
Domellan WL, Cobb LM. Intraabdominl pyloromyotomy. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26: 174-5.
De Caluwe D, Reding R, de Ville de Goyet J, Otte JB. lntraabdominal pyloromyotomy through the umbilical route: A technical improvement. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 33: 1806-7.
Takamizawa S, Obatake M, Muraji T, Tsugawa C, Nishijima E, Satoh S. Supraumbilical pyloromyotomy: Comparison between intracorporeal and extracorporeal approaches. Pediatr Surg Int 2004; 20:101-4.
Ossama M Zakaria
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]